-
Posts
43 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
30 GoodAbout Mark Mulcaster
- Birthday 08/18/1981
Personal Information
-
Website
mmulcaster.wordpress.com
Recent Profile Visitors
2,609 profile views
-
Hi everyone, I have a project coming up later next year, its a feature length documentary that looks like is going to have a theatrical release. We're currently quoting for the post and the producers have asked that we include time to do the theatrical grade pass as well. As a "TV" colourist ie i work for a company that only delivers for Television i've not had much experience grading for a threatre - in fact when i've worked on a couple of super low budget micro theatrical films we've just graded in my normal suite on my BVM X-300. So i'm looking for advice basically on whether i'll get that much benefit from doing the TV grade first (as its the primary release) and then do a a couple of days in a theatre for a trim pass or if its needed at all.I'm not pushing it either way so want to do whats best for the production and they seem to have a decent budget. I'll be working on Baselight in a colour managed workflow either ACES or Filmlight T-Log/E Gamut. Many thanks!
-
I myself have always been told to use some form of I/O box to connect to a grading monitor and currently using the Ultrastudio Monitor 3G for short form projects at home on my Mac. But we’re looking at the future and a wider demand for editors and finishing artists to work from home and doing colour critical work remotely so my question was is using a HDMI port on computer connected to a hdmi port on a reference monitor going to give an accurate and reliable image to work from. From a budgetary perspective if the we wanted purchase several setups I’d prefer to have a more accurate monitor first and then look at better machines if they’re needed. If some form of I/O in the middle of the chain is needed then that’s ok but the current worklaptops only have hdmi ports on them. seeing as the clients are signing off on all manner of devices I feel more reassured when I know what I’m looking is a correctly calibrated image on a robust correction before I deliver. what’s everyone’s thoughts?
-
What is the best color grading software?
Mark Mulcaster replied to Bledar Cili's topic in Editing , Color grading & Finishing
I learnt on Mistika - coming from a editing background I was “wtf?!” But you get to grips with it and the colour tools came on leaps and bounds during my time with it. Im now on Baselight and that’s a lot more locked in and it’s not restrictive but with mistika’s open timeline it was easy to cobble things together and properly comp from scratch. I guess that’s to do with it’s Compositor background. Hands down though Baselight colour management is head and shoulders above any other tool I’ve tried ( I’ve not tried them all though). Admittedly I’ve not tried to finish a whole project in Baselight as we online back in avid using the AAF round trip with Baselight for avid which in it itself is a handy as hell as my spelling is atrocious so I made for a appalling online editor [emoji1787] but I was delivering shows from conform through to final delivery including having to make editorial changes on the Mistika. It still wasn’t easy compared to everything in one box like resolve but I find anything but the simple bit of editing a real chore in Baselight...oh for the days when picture lock actually meant that and not “we’ve run out of money in offline” [emoji1787] The fact both are in essence layer based ways of grading meant it was a easy transition over to Baselight for me. I’d be curious to give Mistika another whirl and see what’s changed...I think I can still remember a few gestures [emoji23][emoji1787] -
I think that may have been mentioned else where (infact i may have asked that too at on point) but if you hold down shift and the you can' find it in the expanded list then you'll need to contact Baselight support to request it.
-
I’m meant to be working on a upcoming project that’s heavily relying on graphics in after effects. I’ll be working After Effrcts in CC 2019 and will be delivering HLG only. I’ll be working remotely for some of the project and so limited access to my BVM X300. I’m expecting to receive Sony F55 or Sony Venice footage shot in SLOG3. I’ve not really worked in a colour managed project outside of Baselight. Does anyone have any tips to setup my project in after effects? Thanks!
-
Any one? lol
-
Im on a Basleight Two so not entirely sure what functionality the student version does or doesn't have but What we do here is create two timelines ; a conform timeline and a separate reference timeline. Once the conform is complete we gang the two cursors and use the the wipe or 2x1 to shot check either by playing the show through or shuttling through it on the timeline. If its me i tend to do it in real time if i have the time so i get a feel for the job, otherwise im pretty sure our busy assistants do it as fast as they can
-
Hiya, As the resident colourist at my facility I've been asked to put together a HDR primer course for people throughout the business, it doesn't need to be massively technical (which is probably why they asked me!). But what i'd like to offer is a snap shot of current industry trends for grading and finishing HDR. So if you have 2-3 minutes i'd be really interested in reading your experiences (can be as brief or expanded upon as you have time for.) Thanks! General questions Have you graded HDR? How often? What type of content are you working on? Who for? (broadcaster, on demand streaming service etc) Workflow questions Are you grading HDR first or SDR first? Are you using a Dolby Vision workflow? If you're not using a Dolby Vision workflow are you doing a manual trim or using some automatic tone mapping? How much time are you given for the creation of your secondary delivery format ie 1 day for a SDR trim pass Do you grade only in PQ ( even without a dolby vision workflow) or do you work in HLG? What grading software are you using? On what platform is the final online being carried out on ie Avid, Premiere Pro, Flame etc? Many thanks -Mark
-
The Arri Look Library is now a available for Baselight this adds additional looks and emulations that are worth taking a look at
-
Apologies to be the necroposter and restart this topic but this video gives you an idea of what you can do in LAB. One thing that ive always wondered and not been able to do is split out the colour channels like he does in Resolve. It was something i was able to do in Mistika but i cant seem to do it on good ole BL.
-
HDR Grading - Colour Reproduction on monitors
Mark Mulcaster replied to Mark Mulcaster's topic in Baselight
Thanks Andy, Putting it like that makes a lot more sense, i think i was approaching it from the wrong perspective, it makes sense about seeing the Rec2020 as a container. I'll have to look for the Dolby: ST 2084 PQ / P3 D65 / 1000 nits viewing option as from what i recall when i wrote my original post i didn't see it listed in my Baselight (we're running 5.1). My thought about grading in PQ/P3 was to play it safe a bit and make sure i wasn't grading any colours out of gamut that my monitor wasn't able to reproduce correctly, or that when the content hits the consumer screens. It may not be necessary but i wanted to try both approaches to see for myself. Ever so quickly what does the transfer matrix do on the X300? I've toggled it on and off but didn't see any difference to the image on screen. Thanks a lot for the links Marc! Thats really very helpful, theres alot of reading there....does it come in audiobook form 😉 Many thanks -Mark -
Its really cool to see Park Road using Mistika for this, Empire magazine have done a stand alone podcast with Peter and he mentions how for the most part the restoration tools used were off the shelf, i don't know if that means they're part of the Mistika tool set or if they're using 3rd party plugins like Neat Video?
-
I'm about to grade some musical performances in HDR - The deliverable will be a HDR10 1000nits @D65. I've have been advised to set my Sony BVM X300 monitor set to P3 rather than the full rec2020 gamut setting as the majority of consumer screens aren’t likely to reach %100 Rec2020 but P3 is far more achievable by a larger cross section of consumer TVs, if i recall my Sony X300 doesn't even cover the full rec2020 colourspace. Is this generally the accepted approach to take for HDR? From alot of the HDR content i've seen (not including TV manufacture demos) the image saturation for HDR doesn't feel hugely more saturated from SDR, preconception-ally speaking. So other than dealing with some very saturated stage lighting i don't see this being a major concern? Looking at my Baselight cursor options I don't have a PQ/P3/100nits cursor on my Baselight. So keeping with the ST2084/PQ/REC2020/1000nits viewing cursor i switched the monitor into P3 and noticed a slight hue shift in my monitor on the test footage. Before i bother the lovely filmlight support team and rasie a ticket i wanted to ask if i need to, or just stick to rec2020 and be mindful of any highly saturated parts of the image? Thanks
-
I'd love to have seen her panel with Jet, and the demo afterwards. Did anyone here attend?
-
Pretty much what Andy says; if you're only delivering Rec709 at the moment then calibrate for that (unless you have lots of time to kill) If you're doing a variety of deliverables and can save presets into your monitor then calibrate accordingly but only work in the relevant preset to what you're being asked to deliver. Its an oldie but a goodie when i say its always good to check that your monitor is in the right settings before you start grading, many a good colourist (inc myself) has learnt that the hard way! LOL