Alex Prohorushkin

Connected Colour Workflow - Part 3

Connected Colour Workflow - Part 2

Connected Colour Workflow - Part 1

2 hours ago, Margus Voll said:

Maybe we should ask why not then ?

For my workflow it just suits good given that we have fusion now on board and raw editing is also nice option.

Maybe so.

I like DaVinci, like the policy of BMD, like tools and regular support, updates, and of course price.

When I talk to colleagues in the majority believe that the priority and main advantage is the price.

Although with each new release of the system expands larger and larger An opportunity.

Alex

1 hour ago, Bruno Mansi said:

Looks like the Lian Li D8000 chassis.

Is this just for your RAID, or are you intending to install a motherboard, PCIE cards etc?

I have a working linux station.
Of course I should, and the raid and the GPU, etc.

Hello everybody.

I have long asked how it is possible not expensive to organize the system unit for a colorist.

Now I attach nesolko photos from my station.
Now it 45Tb raid and a lot of interesting)))

Alex

Hello everybody.

I’ve a question to which no one could not give me an answer.

In these studios like Technicolor, the Lustre program is used with its personal modifications, or not?

Or is this Top Secret and confidential information?

Alex.

3 hours ago, Ildus gabidullin said:

First of all, a brilliant marketing idea
And of course, Davinci hi-end system
But I think the nodal system is better for compositing, for color grading,  layer system is much better 

Of course, the DаVinci system is amazing.
however, calling it Hi-end system, I want to know what the system is not hi-end?
Of course node system works quite good, and yet for the correct color correction are not only nodes and price.

All of you are right.
But why you use it?

Hello everybody.

I have long wanted to ask, but could not.
Why DaVinci?

Because - Price? Quality tools? Flexibility? Accuracy in color? Capabilities? Support?

After all, once the company BM lowered the prices of their program (Davinci), then immediately appeared thousands of "colorists" in the world who "can" create "wonderful" images.

Yes, of course, BM has made available to many people, the world of color correction. But BM did not create these people colorists!

Now almost every other editor thinks he "colorist" and that he is able to do the work of the Colorist.

It reminds me of the transition from foto-film to digital photography.
When I could for a long time to build the shot and choose the composition of the shot, before you take the picture. And then I selected the frame I want to print it already.

Now, I see the thoughtlessness and empty, without life pictures on the Internet.

So, "Why DaVinci?"

Alex.

Sorry for my English...

*for tsvetokora = for ColorCorrection.

Hi.

To date, the best algorithm than Truelight who does the transformation I've never met.
The use of LUT is only a certain patch. That being successfully works.
But Truelight is a mathematical algorithm used for each specific input-output object.

What allows you to make and How? no one system.

So for myself I see it Trulight most advanced and relevant tool in this regard.  "the best Color Management of the Year)"

Alex.

Hello everybody.

The network recently came across the information that has insider information.

BM 2 produces panels!

BASE premium segment will be in the range of $ 5-7k and will work anywhere in the Mac / Win / Lin - (in progress for the replacement of the current panel)
Segment lowcost LITE will be around $ 999 -2K and will work on a different software for tsvetokora ... «Tangent Element killer"

Perhaps you have heard something?

Alex.

Hi Andreas!

Thanks.

Good work and video.

Hello everyone.

I am a professional freelance-colorist for over 5 years (Future film, advertising, commercial video and TV projects) 
I'm willing to do remotely for you color correction to your projects. I live in Russia (Moscow).
I have professional work skills programs Resolve, Lustre, Baselight. 


My contact:

Skype: alex-prohorushkin 
Email: prohorushkin@inbox.ru 
Tel: +7 916 301-2727 

Regards
Alex.

I tried it a year ago. The app is very, very interesting. Training and education is also at a very good level. Lets you understand the skills to work with basic tools, and adapt yourself to the development of matching shots.

Thanks.

very nice.

Maybe have any advanced tutorials from series «How make it?» 

Maybe I should start doing tutorials?

But, only own language…..

Alex

p.s. Very good tutorials from FXPHD (GRD201 and GRD202), Baselight + ColorGrading theory) 

Congratulations!!!

Respect!

4 hours ago, Abby Bader said:

Hi Alex. What makes Truelight the best in your opinion?

Hi Abby.

- Very easy change between differents Colorspaces.

- Very TRUE mathematical algorithms (Conversion LUTs is NOT have it)

- Full control for every stage.

And more))

And maybe should know another languages? 

Hello everybody.
Working in different systems (Lustre , Nucoda, Resolve) use very often a function of group grading.
Of course it is also in Baselight there.

However, not enough function when you can leave visible only group.
This is very important when there is a large number of grading shots. (For example in the movie)

What dp you think about it?

Alex.

Hi,

I think THE Best is 

• Filmlight Truelight 

Alex