MichaelTiemann

Premium
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About MichaelTiemann

  • Rank
    Newbie
  • Birthday 06/09/1964

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. Lesson 16 glosses over the fact that you turned the woman's blonde hair to ginger.
  2. I had the same question, so I opened up the clips, set up the node tree, and started playing. At first it appears to be somewhat magical, but it suddenly makes sense with an RGB waveform monitor (or an RGB parade scope) and a vectorscope. What I noticed is that when the Red output is fed also by the Blue channel, the vector scope show everything being pulled and stretched toward the R target. When the Green output is fed also by the Blue channel, the red-stretched blob rotates and stretches toward the Yl target. You can then watch the magic happen as you rase the Green output into the Blue Channel. What was a large outstretched limb of color pointing towards Yl squishes very quickly to a very thin line that points between R and Cy. Those two complementary colors provide a credible balanced look that simply has no other colors to it--no Mg, no B, no G, and no Yl. But that narrow balanced line is not aligned with the skin-tone line. This can be fixed by rotating the Hue, or by subtracting Red output and re-adjusting Green output to get back to the thin wispy line. When the remaining colors are aligned with the skin tone line, the skin tones look natural, and the balancing complementary colors on the other side of the center make the look. I got this with the following Red Channel: 1 R + 0.9B Green Channel: 1 G + 0.9B Blue Channel: 0.91 G + 1B Hue Rotation: 43.4 Without Hue rotation I got the lines to line up with Blue = -0.5 R + 1.41 G + 1B When I raised the Green output to 2.0 I needed to drop Red to -1.07 and I observed the need for a Hue rotation of 53.30 to get back to the skin-tone line. I also noticed that using larger numbers in the Blue output channel results in greater saturation, which may or may not be desirable. But I think that the fundamental operation we see here is using the RGB Mixer to take us from 3 colors to 2 while letting the skin tone be the skin tone. I will also say that it is INVALUABLE to have a Resolve Mini panel with which to be able to twiddle two knobs that send the colors in opposite directions so that one can maintain the target of the skin tone line while seeing how all the other colors react to various parametric alternatives!
  3. Aha, the key lesson I took from earlier lessons was the importance of applying exposure correction before the LUT, not with respect to other corrections. I'll think harder about that...
  4. In lesson 8 at 4:09 you say "Normally you'd want to dial in exposure first, as explained in earlier lessons". Because of Resolve's Order of Operations (in Chapter 109, Node Editing Basics), the Offset operation takes place before the 3D LUT, so you are, in fact, demonstrating the same approach as explained in the earlier lessons. I don't disagree that exposure correction before the LUT gives a very natural and intentional look. I'm just quibbling with the explanation.