- Popular Post
Mitch Paulson
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Case studies - Free
Case studies - Premium
Resources
Insider
Courses
Forums
Store
Posts posted by Mitch Paulson
-
-
yeah, we did a full week and spilled over into the following week. We then still had vfx shots and titles being dropped in. So really it was almost 2 weeks to finish it.
And Blade Runner is going to be really cool!
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 6/16/2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Gilling said:Like Tom said it depends on a few factors. I've got a feature coming up next week but it's only 84 minutes and 300-ish shots, so I don't think I'll need more than 3-4 days on it, and even that'd be taking it slow.
As budgets go up then invariably time allocated to DI will too, especially when you have new versions of VFX shots being swapped in/out or last minute edit changes being made etc.
I'd say the standard for a studio feature is 2-3 weeks, but that can vary from The Revenant taking two months down to Sicario being done in under a week.
FYI, We didn't do Sicario in under a week. We ended up using 60 hours to complete that DI.
The lowest I usually get is movies that want to be done in about 60-65 hours. Those never have 3D or HDR pass to worry about. Movies like Rouge One, which had all the formats, took me months to complete and ended up using about 300 hours. So, it really can vary.
- 13
Time of color correction
in Editing , Color grading & Finishing
We do have a very efficient process at EFilm. With that movie, there weren't a lot of creatives involved. Roger and I did our pass, then would present to Denis. He has a lot of trust in Roger, so we didn't get a ton of changes from him. There also weren't a ton of vfx shots either. The ones we did have were fairly simple. We didn't have to spend a lot of time having to updating shots. So, with all that, 60 hours was plenty for that movie. There weren't any budget restrictions on it really, we had more time allowed for the DI, we just didn't need it all.